tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8247002493176705100.post5997625023757323734..comments2023-10-14T02:24:04.900-07:00Comments on This Day In Science Fiction: 16 May 2015Prof. Hubbardhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16575880031145705761noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8247002493176705100.post-59405172799053281152017-05-15T10:00:11.050-07:002017-05-15T10:00:11.050-07:00George Gaynes was born the 3rd ;)George Gaynes was born the 3rd ;)https://www.facebook.com/madmanwiththebluebox?ref=eyJzaWQiOiIwLjI3NjYyMjAyNTg2OTcwMzY0IiwicXMiOiJKVFZDSlRJeVJHOWpkRzl5SlRJd1YyaHZKVEl3TFNVeU1FMWhaQ1V5TUUxaGJpVXlNRmRwZEdnbE1qQmhKVEl3UW05NEpUSXlKVFZFIihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15010674264740324242noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8247002493176705100.post-7853248829882470112015-05-18T07:02:40.479-07:002015-05-18T07:02:40.479-07:00Oops. Thanks, I fixed it.
You are right about th...Oops. Thanks, I fixed it. <br /><br />You are right about the baby boom, but if he could have found the increase from 1935 to 1955, not impossible even using pre-Internet research methods, his lowball number should have been a 40 million increase.Prof. Hubbardhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16575880031145705761noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8247002493176705100.post-18545779982199230762015-05-18T05:18:41.175-07:002015-05-18T05:18:41.175-07:00Uh, 24MM, not 14. Point stands, but he is writing...Uh, 24MM, not 14. Point stands, but he is writing at the beginning of (one of) the so-called "baby boom."*<br /><br />One of in the sense that whether it starts in 1948, 1954, or somewhere between seems to vary by what argument someone is trying to make. Ken Houghtonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01440837287933536370noreply@blogger.com